Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxury4play

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luxury4play

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was a speedy, but contested with an underconstruction tag - there has since been no activity on page for the last 7 days. Doesn't appear notable, no sources. Can't find any reference to their 'own brand of clothing' other than their online store [1] which appears nothing more than a CafePress style site. Possible WP:CONFLICT issue as per article's talk page. AlanI ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see no evidence of notability. Doesn't seem to pass WP:WEB. JUJUTACULAR 20:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Absolutely no reliable source coverage I could locate. --Cybercobra (talk) 01:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Searches on varieties of the name and url brings up nothing useful either, and website (basically a forum) press area is nothing more than announcements of "partners/sponsors" that could just be affiliates. Flowanda | Talk 19:49, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.