Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxiole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 08:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Luxiole[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article and the two others in this nomination cannot reasonably be considered notable enough for a standalone article. It is almost entirely WP:INUNIVERSE, and has been unreferenced for years (because it is not referencable to reliable, significant coverage). This is Wikia material. These are about ships in a series of two video games who are barely notable are scarcely referenced themselves, and potential candidates for deletion. :) · Salvidrim! · ✉ 02:32, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (all three of the proposed) per nom. Unreferenced, not notable and inaccessible due to in-universe style. JTST4RS (talk) 09:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTPLOT but mostly because of lack of reliable sources. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.