Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lusocoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lusocoin[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable concurrency (appears to be yet another unremarkable fork of Bitcoin). Salimfadhley (talk) 21:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I searched for coverage and found very little. There are websites associated with the creators of Lusocoin, cryptocurrency forums, and domain name analyses; but none of these are reliable, independent sources. As of now, the article fails WP:GNG, though this could change if the cryptocurrency suddenly gains more coverage. Altamel (talk) 18:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, agree WP:TOOSOON. --Salimfadhley (talk) 19:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Not nearly enough coverage to establish notability. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 22:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON. For what it's worth, the page Cryptocurrency states that there were more than 275 cryptocurrencies as of May 2014 but only lists 14 of the most notable ones; when this gets coverage similar to those, I think that would be a fair time to create a page for this, but for now it lacks appropriate coverage. Upjav (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.