Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lupin the 3rd (Epoch)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 13:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lupin the 3rd (Epoch)[edit]

All the information on the page is already covered by List of Lupin III video games as it is just a listing of info. The page has been around for a while with no serious updates. じんない 20:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. じんない 01:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Lupin III video games. I don't think the list style suits the video game article, I'd like to replace the "main" page with a non-list format once this AfD closes. Dandy Sephy (talk) 16:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Lupin III video games, due to lack of reliable sources. Marasmusine (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Nothing that is not mentioned in either the list or main articles. I don't know if a redirect would make sense as there is a negligible edit history as well as a non-plausible search term. MuZemike (talk) 20:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: old, obscure video game, the article isn't likely to develop any further. I'm opposed to making it a redirect as it's a non-plausible search term.--Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 00:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think this is more of a matter of cleanup, and I don't think that's grounds for deletion. Several other games from the series have good articles, with a little effort I think this article could be of the same caliber. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 03:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mgm|^(talk) 05:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I can't agree with Amwestover at all. The other games (or at least some of them) have much more developed pages and are possibly more notable. It's not a cleanup issue because there is nothing to clean up Dandy Sephy (talk) 08:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as redundant. -- Goodraise (talk) 16:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as redundant. --Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Redundant. Chasingsol (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Redundant. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.