Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luluwah bint Abdulaziz Al Saud
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Luluwah bint Abdulaziz Al Saud[edit]
- Luluwah bint Abdulaziz Al Saud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable on her own DimaG (talk) 22:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless I'm mistaken Sultana bint Abdulaziz Al-Saud is the same person. We need to figure out the best article title and redirect the other (or redirect both to the royal house they belong to. - Mgm|(talk) 00:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you are mistaken. They died over two months apart and (this is the real giveaway) they have different names. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As I said for her sister or (more likely) half-sister, "While notability is not inherited in most cases, royals are an exception: by its very nature, royalty is inherited. Surely a woman who was the daughter of a king and the sister of several kings is notable," especially as we have a strong source on which to base this article. Nyttend (talk) 00:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Keep as discussed, royal family members are notable. DGG (talk) 09:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - membership in a royal family constitutes notability. Scanlan (talk) 01:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.