Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Sayers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Sayers[edit]

Luke Sayers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was tagged for speedy deletion under A7, but I think being CEO of a major company qualifies as an assertion. Ten seconds Googling suggests there may be sources about him. No opinion on the merits for now. Mackensen (talk) 11:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...and as WP:INVALIDBIO says, "person A may be included in the related article on B" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:09, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No indication that this CEO inherits notability any more than any others Member Firm CEO. Merely one CEO of one part of PwC: no indication there's any particularly noteworthy about this individual. WP:Notable Speedy delete. MvjsTalking 12:29, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nothing at all confirming his own independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete fails WP:BIO simply being CEO of an Australian arm of a multinational has no inherent notability. LibStar (talk) 13:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.