Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Mario O. Rizzo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Mario O. Rizzo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubiously notable radio DJ. Great resume but only 26 Google results and probably doesn't meet NBIO or GNG as the coverage is light. I can't check the 2003 book mentioned but the other sources are basically passing mentions and profiles on self-published blog sites or the person's own website. Andre🚐 00:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Businesspeople, Dance, Music, Radio, Ecuador, Florida, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing more than incidental mentions in RS. Mach61 (talk) 05:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – No sources found are independent or significantly covered. Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 08:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sources found that are both independent and significant coverage. Also, although I don't have access to the 2003 book, it doesn't seem like it would be significant coverage of the subject either per a few summaries I found of the book online. Bsoyka (talk) 21:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, due to lack of reliable sources. Assuming the print source is reliable, the guideline requires multiple sources to establish notability. Not that it weighs on the discussion, but the article also borrows liberally from this source for its prose. Substantial rewrite to avoid plagiarism is recommended if kept. Zsinj^Talk 03:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.