Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis G. Jimenez-Arias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Luis G. Jimenez-Arias

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried to clean the article up a bit but I can't really see how this fellow meets our inclusion criteria. He wouldn't seem to pass WP:GNG, or WP:PROF. The article is an almost word-for-word copy of the profile in his book. Stalwart111 05:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. fails to meet any criteria for notability or inclusion on Wiki. Also agree that what is written appears to be lifted almost word for word from his book. In fact the one reference listed, links back to the book itself. Caffeyw (talk) 07:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on the merits. I don't see the coverage necessary to justify an article on this person. It's a CV, essentially. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.