Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Casíllas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Casíllas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Casillas competed in the Olympics without medaling. We have one databae source on him, which is not even remotely close enough to justify an article. My search for additional sources came up with absolutely nothing. John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Keep, per the extra info/sources, below, but worst case then Redirect to Modern pentathlon at the 1936 Summer Olympics per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:R#KEEP and WP:CHEAP. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Mexico. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to keep (see below) from previous vote for a redirect to Modern pentathlon at the 1936 Summer Olympics per Lugnuts. WP:PRESERVE is editing policy. NGS ^{Shakin' All Over} 13:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It would appear that later Casillas became a General in the Mexican Army (source here) and was the commander of the Military Zone of Chiapas (ref). Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting sources. I'll keep this page watchlisted. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping to Lugnuts to give him a chance to preserve this article. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for this - I've updated the article with the new info, and this should grant extra notability to keep the article. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:08, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the new sources. Scorpions13256 (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging No Great Shaker, the only other voter in the discussion. Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. With the new sources, it's a given. Thank you, Scorpions13256, for the ping. Have amended my earlier vote above. NGS ^{Shakin' All Over} 21:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Army general on top of the plausible keep to begin with. Jacona (talk) 12:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.