Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Cabral (evangelist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Cabral (evangelist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deleted after a PROD in Dec 2009, but undeleted in June with the comment I have restored this article from deletion, believing it to be the biography of a notable person. Please give me a chance - about five days - to link the article to sources confirming his notability. In August I reminded that editor of his statement, but he doesn't seem to have contributed since. The article itself is only referenced to self-published sources, and I don't see any real claim to notability, just an extensive, worthwhile employment history The-Pope (talk) 02:54, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, doesn't appear to be notable per WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 03:54, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 03:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing here that indicates the subject is notable. St Anselm (talk) 04:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Failed to meet requirements before and editor that restored the article failed to provide further information. Previous opinion should stand. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 07:18, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:51, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- The fact that the article Harbourside Church still lists him as on their staff and that his persent appointment only has a redlink does not fill me with confidnece as to his notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.