Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Lee (Czech pornographic actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Lee (Czech pornographic actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not comply with WP:PORNBIO standards. 71.230.1.236 (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this pornographic actress. Joe Chill (talk) 20:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO, no evidence that the subject can pass the GNG or any other specialized guideline; no indication the article can be appropriately expanded beyond the existing stub. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Why do people want to delete everything to do with porn from wikipedia? It's censorship really. VenomousConcept (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- It's not about censorship. It's about notability. Which your !vote has nothing to do with. Joe Chill (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All pages to do with porn stars get deleted. There are four references, that should be enough. VenomousConcept (talk) 13:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - What don't you understand about multiple sources with significant coverage? Joe Chill (talk) 19:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:PORNBIO, cannot find any useful sources (and I looked really, really hard). -- Scjessey (talk) 21:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
at least keep the photo Inmate 5317 (talk) 22:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.