Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Fernandez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to List of Degrassi characters. Merge rather than redirect so the list can be structured à la List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters. czar  15:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Fernandez[edit]

Lucy Fernandez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable character and article is unreferenced. Tagged for no references since Feb 08, for in universe writing since Oct 09, and for original research since Sept 07. Does not meet GNG. Also per recent AfDs for similar characters in the series: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tessa Campanelli, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly J. Sinclair, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Stone (Degrassi character), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Cameron all which were closed as delete/redirect. Gloss 18:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 18:44, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 19:23, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:49, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Article fails WP:V. This should have been deleted a long time ago. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and clean up. This is a major character featured in two prominent series. Tchaliburton (talk) 06:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a criterion that gets a character into Wikipedia as an article topic — if reliable source coverage isn't present to properly demonstrate real world context for why the character is notable, then they get included in a merged character list rather than standing alone as an independent article. Bearcat (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:08, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 07:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.