Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luciano Fleischfresser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per page creator's request. VQuakr (talk) 01:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Luciano Fleischfresser[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Meteorologist/Atmospheric Scientist. An adjunct professor of environmental engineering. Appears to not have published any articles since his PhD days in 2000. Has written a 100-page monograph on tropical climate modeling. Article is written by Dr. Fleischfresser. Fails WP:PROF Bgwhite (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Bgwhite (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, basically per nom. No evidence of significant citability or of passing WP:PROF on other grounds. Nsk92 (talk) 11:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No WoS publications and no other credible claim within WP:PROF indicates no notability. Uncontroversial delete. Agricola44 (talk) 16:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. No cites in GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete for lack of evidence of passing any of the WP:PROF criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - Zero notable links found on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 06:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The author of the article has requested the article to be deleted. They left a speedy delete tag on the article. Author sent me an email apologizing for creating the article and it was his mistake for not reading the notability requirement. Bgwhite (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.