Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luccia Reyes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 03:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Luccia Reyes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No legitimate claim of notability. No reliably sourced content. All references are completely unusable in BLPs (and pretty much for any purpose here). Borders on eligibility for speedy deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 16:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability asserted only by the barest of margins. No real claim of passing WP:PORNBIO. No reliable sources offered and none found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Strong Fail in WP:GNG.Guilherme Burn (talk) 17:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Comes nowhere close to passing PORNBIO and GNG. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the reasons stated above. As should be obvious, "Boobpedia.com is not a reliable source. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I wanted to make a sarcastic keep based on "Boobpedia" but it ended up turning into a rant on why it's everything wrong with the world!, Anyway back on topic fails every policy on this project namely PORNBIO and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:51, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.