Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Kirnon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Kirnon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of actual notability at the moment. Montserrat is an extremely small nation, and playing for their national team is the equivalent of playing for a team of the best 11 players from some village basically. There is no good sourcing available for Kirnon, just passing mentions (or the usual databases and primary sources of course). May obviously become notable later in his career. Fram (talk) 13:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and England. Fram (talk) 13:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just move it to draft. There's a very good chance he plays first-team for Salford in the next 12 months. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Montserrat is an extremely small nation, and playing for their national team is the equivalent of playing for a team of the best 11 players from some village basically." is pretty condescending, actually - very pro-Western media approach. He's made his international debut in one of CONCACAF's main competitions (FIFA member) Zanoni (talk) 20:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Zanoni (talk) 20:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify After doing a search on Google, no WP:SIGCOV, but a few mentions in match reviews. Seems a bit standard for athletes that receive regular playing time, but because it is potentially being a case of WP:TOOSOON I don't think it should be deleted. IrishOsita (talk) 02:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.