Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucan Valerius
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lucan Valerius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable minor char from a video game. no notablility. this is not the skyrim wiki (which btw, was already used as the refs for this article). sigh. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as crufty information that doesn't show how it is independently notable. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Or merge to main game article. No reliable sourcing. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No indication of notability. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 10:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Didn't find coverage in reliable sources for this video game character. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Are we going to have articles about all Skyrim characters!? No, seriously, there is no independant, significant coverage in reliable sources, no notability established. Salvidrim! 17:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per Salvidrim, everyone else. No notability/coverage outside the scope of the game itself. Sergecross73 msg me 21:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.