Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucía Benavides

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucía Benavides[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a journalist, not reliably sourced as clearing WP:JOURNALIST. The only notability claim in evidence here is that she exists, and the article is "referenced" entirely to her staff profiles on the self-published websites of her own past employers -- but as always, the notability test for a journalist is not the ability to verify that she exists, but the ability to verify that she has been the subject of coverage in sources other than her own employers. Bearcat (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 20:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet general notability guidelines. Missvain (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.