Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lu-Yu Tea Culture Institute (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, per additional sources. Rlendog (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lu-Yu Tea Culture Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This organization does not seem notable. I can't find any good sources for it. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For searches also try trad. Ch.: "陸羽茶藝中心" and also "lu yu tea art center". icetea8 (talk) 04:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I improved the referencing. Appears to meet WP:GNG.--Pontificalibus (talk) 08:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 11:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The current references are sufficient to establish notability. Pichpich (talk) 22:56, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now sufficiently referenced to pass the GNG. Pol430 talk to me 23:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.