Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovers Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Lovers Band

Lovers Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another Myspace/ Facebook type band? Even the stated official website dosn't seem to exist and with 2 other links to Facebook and You Tube I would suggest they are not notable. Wintonian (talk) 00:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 17:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete See no references, other than MySpace. Pilif12p (contribs) 02:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
• Delete - Article barely makes any sense. Article says they're signed with EMI, but searching the site does not appear to return anything relevant. Much of the article (the member biographies, for instance) appears to be machine translated from the band's site. I do not see any evidence of notability. though @ Wintonian, the site does work fine. the link in the external links section had a superfluous "|" in it that was breaking it, which I went ahead and fixed. Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok thanks didn't spot that - still fails WP:BAND though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by --Wintonian (talk) 21:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.