Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love is love

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE as nonsense. JIP | Talk 04:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Love is love[edit]

Doesn't seem to meet our criteria for speedy deletion, but it does not seem to be a worthy subject of an encyclopedia article. Sitthisoneout1 (talk) 00:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Uncomforming with (WP:NOR) -- No Original Research, perhaps? I think this must have been a prank. Kind of funny, but it should be removed. Halifax Nomad (talk) 02:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; it does feel like this article should be eligible for speedy deletion, but none of the criteria fit. -FrankTobia (talk) 03:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A1 Insufficient context. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete patent nonsense per the 2nd definition, and no context per 10Lb.Ham JuJube (talk) 03:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.