Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love and Some Swear Words

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 09:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Love and Some Swear Words

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 16:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a Google search for this article does not throw up many results that are actually about the film. The article itself is very brief, and does not supply much information other than this is a Croatian film. Vorbee (talk) 17:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:NFILM, restored and preserved in Croatian national archive [1]. Daß Wölf 23:29, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wolfy. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete – Unless the article has some significant addition to it, there is no reason at all to keep a one- or two-sentence article. Less than a stub, doesn't receive many page views. Redditaddict69 (talk) 14:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wölf. Nationally released film by Croatia Film and was reviewed by the English language and American Daily Variety [2] demonstrates passing WP:NFILM not to mention directed by very notable director with just as notable actors. Being a stub is not a proper reason to delete. Stubs of notable topics are always better than no articles. --Oakshade (talk) 04:32, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as being preserved in a national archive meets WP:NFO.— Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.