Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Humiliates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Love Humiliates[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Love Humiliates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability DonaldD23 talk to me 16:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Egypt. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep — WP:NFILM states
(3.1). S.A. Seif directed it and the film stands out (as the page explains with a source I added yesterday ...) as the only light comedy he ever made, at a pivotal moment in his career before the 1952 Revolution. I think that this alone seems enough to make the page worth keeping. Also, the page was created on January 18th. Isn’t all this a bit rushed? At least let’s wait for people with access to sources in Arabic or monographies to add to the pageMY OH MY 18:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of their career.
- When the page was created is irrelevant. If sources are known at time of creation they should be added then, or this article should have been in DRAFT until they were listed. We can't just create articles in the hopes that other editors will improve it enough to pass notability requirements. They need to be present at creation. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- The page does not need to be improved to meet notability requirements, the subject of the page meets them or not. Here it seems to me it does but it could indeed have been better sourced to avoid this process, that I still find quite hasty, despite your kind explanation. Thank you anyway. MY OH MY 18:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- When the page was created is irrelevant. If sources are known at time of creation they should be added then, or this article should have been in DRAFT until they were listed. We can't just create articles in the hopes that other editors will improve it enough to pass notability requirements. They need to be present at creation. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.