Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love's Enduring Promise

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 02:28, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Love's Enduring Promise[edit]

Obviously this page can't stay as it is because it's simply one person's personal reaction to the film - i.e. not ecyclopaedic. (The current content should be put into IMDB or similar as a review.)

However, I've not nominated this for a speedy delete in case someone thinks the film itself (not someone's POV) can be made into an encyclopaedic entry. Finbarr Saunders 20:16, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-encyclopedic review. If you want it to be made into an article, drop of a request at the movie wikiproject. - Mgm|^(talk) 21:37, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
Clean-up, the movie was nominated for a couple of awards. The article might have some potential. --Bob 21:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was actually going to make this into a useful stub myself, but when I went to IMDB to do the research, I found that this was a 2004 made-for-TV movie starring a bunch of unknowns that was nominated (but did not win) a couple of awards I've never even heard of. Kramer vs. Kramer this ain't. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:13, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Fernando. If someone wanted to recreate a useful article about it later, no problem. But I doubt it would happen. --Etacar11 03:32, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above - Tεx τ urε 21:06, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.