Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovari (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Actually, the thing was speedy deletable as recreation of previously deleted content, but when it wasn't I will let the seconds AFD debate overrule the first one. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity. Second deletion- see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovari. Staecker 13:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - If the annoying bold text can be turned into links or regular text. Ruby 18:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep.
Has had a charted hit on any national music chart, in at least one large or medium-sized country[1]. "These Tears" - Billboard Latin Freestyle Airplay #4 (8/16/02) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovari (talk • contribs)
- Delete per nom. TheRingess 05:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, charting singles passes WP:MUSIC, series of minor acting roles passes WP:BIO. Kappa 07:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, remember- this page was deleted less than two weeks ago for being vanity. And it still is, questionable notability aside. Staecker 13:29, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The page is of a biographical nature and states facts about a performer. I don't see where Vanity fits in. Naomi/NaomiJanuary 2006 (UTC) —The preceding improperly signed comment was added by Lovari (talk • contribs) .
- Speedy delete as db-repost. Stifle 23:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.