Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lourdes Public School and Junior College, Kottayam (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedual keep. Procedural keep since this was nominated by a sock. Feel free to renominate if one so desires. Missvain (talk) 01:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lourdes Public School and Junior College, Kottayam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Institution which has no inherent notability and does not satisfy WP:NSCHOOLS as no WP:RS satisfying ORGDEPTH was found with a WP:BEFORE. The previous AFD by a sockpuppet, hence the result was speedy Keep. Powerful Karma (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC) strike per WP:SOCKSTRIKE and this -- Beccaynr (talk) 05:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Fails NSCHOOL. Kolma8 (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per revisions to the article and sources added from national news outlets that create sufficient WP:ORGDEPTH to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization. Beccaynr (talk) 22:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Does the sources you added pass WP:NSCHOOL?AgentCody 01:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)~~ strike per WP:SOCKSTRIKE and this -- Beccaynr (talk) 05:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep without prejudice to a speedy re-nomination since it was nominated by a sockpuppet. Although, there does seem to be some references in the article and I'm suspicious re-nominating it would result in anything other then keep anyway. So if it's not procedurally kept then I'm going with just outright keep. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree that the sources added to the article demonstrate WP:ORGDEPTH Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.