Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louisiana Tech Bulldogs football, 1901–1909

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:52, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Louisiana Tech Bulldogs football, 1901–1909

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Well-cited individual season articles have been created for every season of the Louisiana Tech Bulldogs football program. These decade articles no longer serve a useful purpose, and I don't think they would serve a useful purpose as redirects since they are implausible search terms. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Agreed that these no longer serve any useful purpose. Ejgreen77 (talk) 05:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Patriarca12 (talk) 11:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 04:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Cbl62 (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Also, why hasn't this been closed yet? BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This discussion was never transcluded to a daily log page. Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination per se. --Finngall ^talk 23:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 00:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete all seems non-controversial and a natural advancement to work. Good job! Should we leave re-directs for searching/etc?--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't think anyone would ever search for "Louisiana Tech Bulldogs football, 1910–1919" or the like. Jweiss11 (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Probably not, just thinking of outside websites that may have already indexed the page. No preference from me.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think the only way these articles would be appropriate is if there were not year-by-year articles, but as the nom said, that is no longer the case. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 17:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Golam Mukit ☆ (talk) 19:44, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.