Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Stratten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Stratten[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has a famous sister and ex-husband, but fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Has an IMDB page. Not that notable but no harm in keeping a page which can be a stub.--C E (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. Charles Burg has an IMDb page too. Should we add an article for him, if that's all it takes? Wikipedia is not IMDb. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is an invalid argument (WP:OTHERSTUFF). However, Wikipedia:External_links/Perennial_websites#IMDb says what needs to be said, ie that IMDb is not a reliable source. Tigraan (talk) 15:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. –Davey2010^Talk 17:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Just plain doesn't meet any notability standard. No point in merging; all the relevant information is already in either her sister's or Bogdanovich's articles. Nha Trang ^Allons! 18:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.