Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise-Eugénie Bonaparte
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert T | @ | C 00:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Individual seems notable only as a consequence of being distantly related to the more famous Napoleon Bonaparte of France. While I'm certain that the individual in question merits a mention on someone else's page (her father's page, for example, who seems marginally noteworthy in his own right), this entry reads simply like a geneology entry, and provides no reason why Louise-Eugénie Bonaparte is, herself, worthy of a full, seperate Wikipedia entry. Extreme Unction 15:23, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a speedy, unless being the daughter of a notable person is a claim to notability. JPD (talk) 15:47, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is the daughter of the son of the brother of Napoleon Bonaparte. Merge can be acceptable. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 16:26, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notable accomplishments in her own right. Durova 16:54, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a footnote to a footnote in history. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 16:57, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There's an inconsistency in this article. The Bonaparte article lists her as the daughter of Jerome Napoleon Bonaparte II, rather than the daughter of Napoléon Joseph Charles Paul Bonaparte. I vote to redirect to Jerome Napoleon Bonaparte II, since that seems to be the correct parent. — RJH 17:00, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- She's still pretty non-noteable regardless of who her actual father is. Just sayin'. — Extreme Unction 17:12, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I indeed noticed an inconsistency at some point, but was too busy voting delete on all these people to check. The fact that there is a mistake somewhere should push us to delete as soon as possible, as the presence of obvious mistakes like this one really hurt the project. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:55, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- merge into a list of descendents of Napoleon or something. Trollderella 17:28, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. *drew 01:12, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.