Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Pierre Comeau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Pierre Comeau

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the relevant standard, WP:PROF. The citation record does not show an influence on his profession--the higest citations in Google Scholar are 84, 47, 20, 13 . There are no other indications of notability --being a keynote speaker and helping organize a conference are purely routine for any academic . The references are mostly mere listings, or articles in minor trade publications. DGG ( talk ) 02:57, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:36, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete I agree, there is no indication of notability per WP:NPROF yet, may be TOOSOON (thesis 2016). --hroest 21:14, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. His scholarly impact does not yet demonstrate a pass of WP:PROF, and WP:GNG-type notability is also not evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.