Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Fuzelier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Nominator does not give a valid reason for deletion. Bduke (Discussion) 20:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Fuzelier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very short. 333-blue 08:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Keep – Notable (in Grove) prolific author. "Very short" is not a WP:DEL-REASON. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - Stub status has nothing to do with notability. Nominator seems to be making a lot of nonsensical nominations. JTdale ^Talk 11:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Why was this even nominated? We don't delete articles for being short. There are many stubs = "very short" articles in Wikipedia. We add to them to make them better. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Nom makes no sense, an article being a stub is not a valid reason for deletion. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 16:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.