Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louder than Words

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The title will be hard redirected to Loose Change (video) for GFDL purposes. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Louder than Words

First deletion reason: Non-notable conspiracy cruft video producer. Fails to assert notability by reference to any reliable sources. Cites only to Alex Jones' websites and a podcast. Fails WP:RS, WP:NOR, WP:NOT, and WP:VAIN. Morton devonshire 18:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article basically contains information about Loose Change. As such, the information belongs there and we don't need a separate article for the nn production company. --Aude (talk contribs as tagcloud) 18:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vandal-magnet, and while it presently serves as a decent clearing house for merged material from Dylan Avery, Korey Rowe and Jason Bermas I'm sure any relevant non-cruft can be merged easily. I've already done some partial-merging to harvest the revision info from this article and move it over. Given that Loose Change (video) is their only production, I can agree with nom.--Rosicrucian 18:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Aude and Rosicrucian. This article was only created to make the Loose Change (video) article seem more important than it is. --Aaron 19:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. JoshuaZ 19:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom, Aude and Rosicrucian. Notability not established. Sandy 19:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete three guys in their twenties with nothing to their credit except for one video. GabrielF 19:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Peephole 19:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Rosicrucian. CWC(talk) 20:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Crockspot 13:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn.--MONGO 08:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Rosicrucian --Geneb1955^Talk/_CVU 14:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as noted above, no need for a separate article on a company that has no importance independent of the film. Pascal.Tesson 18:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Snowball Not Notable. Delete the cruft. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 20:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Snowball per nom Tbeatty 22:27, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Raydd 16:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: All the relevant information has been merged into the Loose Change (video) article.--Peephole 19:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.