Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lou Reid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ...presuming Scberry's rationale is towards keeping the article, combined with the nom being blocked as a sock. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 01:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lou Reid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am bring the AfD because I am not sure he meets article eligibility on his own. Notability is not inherited, and he seems to only be recognized with and/or because of others. Kellymoat (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC) blocked sock puppet Atlantic306 (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 14:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 14:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 14:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am relatively new to Wikipedia, so I will be keenly interested in the arguments for deletion, as I am unclear what makes this artist ineligible for inclusion. He has been a band-leader for many years, and most bluegrass musicians are primarily participants in ensembles. That, and the fact that he is cited on so many other artists' pages, are my rationales for creating the article. Thanks for reading! Scberry (talk) 13:36 16 July 2017
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 09:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.