Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Beat 4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 19:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Los Beat 4[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BAND Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 00:04, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 00:04, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Plenty of sources in English and Spanish to support their entry: Historia social de la música popular en Chile, 1950-1970 [1], Psychedelic Chile: Youth, Counterculture, and Politics on the Road to Socialism and Dictatorship [2], En La Quebrá Del Ají. Rock En Chile En Tiempos De Revolución, 1967, 1973 [3] (pg. 190), Sonido, música y actitud en el rock chileno de los años sesenta [4] (pg. 15), and whatever more you may need. Why? I Ask (talk) 00:47, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add them to the article and then I'll just close this AfD as a keep. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 01:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with Why? I Ask's sourcing. Looking at them myself they do provide sigcov and clearly show independent academic attention. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep There are reliable sources in the article to support their notability, plus as Why! I Ask and Mello say, there is more we can add. Antonio Member of the 20 years club Martin (say whaaattttt?) 04:24, 20 September, 2022 (UTC)
Comment We can all end this if y'all will just update the article with the sources to make this pass WP:BAND, it will take whole minutes on y'alls part. If you can do this then I'll just end this. If I was a subject matter expert I would just add it myself but I'm not and there for shouldn't make those edits. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 08:28, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As the nominator, the responsibility is with you. Speaking of whole minutes of work, perhaps you could have found all those same sources during a WP:BEFORE search, instead of just sending it to AfD with nothing but a two-word reason. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:49, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In addition to sources found by the other voters above, via Google Books one can see that this band is frequently covered in histories of Chilean entertainment. The article could probably be fleshed out with a much more robust history. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. My own exhaustive search on this subject finds it to be notable with an abundance of reliable sources and mentions in literature relating to the history of the Chilean entertainment industry. Creamjuice (talk) 02:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've started adding sources and rewriting the page. Please feel free to withdraw, now. Why? I Ask (talk) 04:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article now has sources that support notability. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 19:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.