Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Angeles Diamonds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Diamonds[edit]

Los Angeles Diamonds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable IMO, nothing in article indicates notability Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. To be honest, I forgot this article was still up...I agree, they did turn out to be quite non-notable (they never played a game), so that means it's OK to delete. And per G7 of CSD, it can be speedy deleted. Tom Danson (talk) 13:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete At creator's request per WP:G7, or for failure to make a statement of the subject's importance per WP:A7. In all events, subject clearly fails notability guidelines per WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.