Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loretta Lynch (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Disambiguation is determined to be unnecessary. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loretta Lynch (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly a hatnote situation. The second Lynch does not even have an article. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 18:07, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hatnote is quicker and easier for readers, and as this is an unusual name, unlikely a third of this name will pop up soon - even then a double hatnote would work well. Proddable, see WP:2DABS. Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even a hatnote is not really necessary in this case. Station1 (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and forget the hatnote. If anyone really wants to find the non-notable Loretta Lynch, they can use the search function. — Gorthian (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:47, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.