Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorena Rae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lorena Rae[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm struggling when I look both at this article and its references to see why this person has genuine notability. Models are ten a penny. Cover girls are ten a penny, and I see nothing about this lady that changes my mind. Does she inherit some sort of notability from Victoria's secret? Somehow I doubt that Fiddle Faddle 21:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 21:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 21:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Truth be told I tried to get this thing nuked while it was still even a draft (and I got yelled at for that). But. Take out the “she’s Leonardo DiCaprio’s best girl” aspect (et tu, Vogue?), take the modeling accomplishments that just barely get her on board such as the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, Maxim, or L’Oreal, the fact reminds that she has enough significant coverage in both Germany and America that pay attention to her career just a bit more than her Hollywood exploits. For that, she passes GNG. Trillfendi (talk) 22:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 04:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 00:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of the claims to notability are substantive. Wikipedia is not a tabloid or a gossip rag.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep per significant coverage. Fish and karate (talk) 17:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Not posted by me. Fish+Karate 10:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Special:Diff/970960061 stuck one was forged. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
keep Per above. Mogo803 (talk) 11:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked sockpuppet. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

18:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. NavjotSR (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.