Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lords of the blade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by User:Nick Dowling. (Non-admin closure.) --erachima formerly tjstrf 05:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lords of the blade[edit]

Fails WP:N, WP:V, and I doubt seriously that either can be fixed. Izno (talk) 03:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This is a gaming guild unlikely to be notable per WP:ORG. The article contains multiple implausible claims, and the only source named is a general page from a message board (a non-reliable source anyway) which doesn't even indicate any specific mention of this guild. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This whole page makes unverifiable claims out the yin-yang, none of them sourced -- because no sources have apparently written about these guys. Fails WP:ORG by a longshot. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:RS. --- Taroaldo (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable.RyRy5 talk 04:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete This is all a load of horse manure, and I'll be bold and declare them all lies and a hoax. Not even Nihilum has a Wikipedia page. They're a damn sight better than these... whatevers. DarkAudit (talk) 04:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.