Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lords Reform (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep - no reason given for nomination. Thryduulf 15:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lords Reform[edit]

Restarting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lords Reform due to the last AFD being for multiple articles such that a clear consensus could not be determined for the two remaining articles that appear to have been mostly rewritten. Cowman109^Talk 01:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep There appears to be no reason given to delete this article. Catchpole 10:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The original reason was given at the original AfD, but I agree, this new AfD needs its own reason for deletion to be given, otherwise it becomes void. Carcharoth 11:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - needs lots of tidying up and improvement, but that is no reason to delete. Carcharoth 11:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - inexplicable nomination. Eusebeus 11:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think the editors involved should perhaps look at these two articles and the main House of Lords article and try to split up the material better, and retitle the articles. I think the titles of the articles are poor and the articles probably duplicate each other. --Brianyoumans 12:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This has the beginnings of a really good article. Fys. Ta fys aym. 12:14, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep The references and other areas do need tidying up, but so far it looks like a pretty good article. --Alex (Talk) 13:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.