Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loop line (railway)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Circle route. It's clear that there is no desire for the article to exist at this location, though there is no consensus where exactly to go. I've boldly chosen circle route as what is in my view the best target, but others are welcome to modify that either boldly or via a talk page discussion. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Loop line (railway)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDICTIONARY. We already have information covered in Circle Line; thus this page serves no purpose and should be merged or deleted. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 16:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (selectively) this improper spinoff into loop line. gidonb (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Circle line. No reason for this to be spun off. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Circle route - Tbf69 🛈 🗩 11:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.