Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looch[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article previously deleted by PROD. Unsourced, non-notable movie, which fails WP:NFILM JMHamo (talk) 23:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:43, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An absolutely non-notable subject. The article has been unsourced for four years, and I tried searching for anything and learned there aren't any sources that support the article at all, which proves it's notability. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 23:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Found no SIGCOV (nn). - Flori4nKT A L K 00:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is a promotional blurb trying to masquerade as a Wikipedia article.TH1980 (talk) 03:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unreferenced (for a reason!) self-promo regarding a non-notable subject, fails on every WP:NFILM point. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:37, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, a self-promotional article with no sources. Nika2020 (talk) 13:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.