Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longest-reigning emperors in China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Alex Shih ^Talk 08:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Longest-reigning emperors in China[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is already a "List of rulers of China" page. In the wiki to explore who is the longest is an original study, unless there are several academic studies. O1lI0 (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 05:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 05:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 05:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nothing worth saving here. Timmyshin (talk) 07:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails, WP:NOT, in particular, #3 of WP:NOTSTATS - "Excessive listings of unexplained statistics". Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:CFORK. Not only is there a List of rulers of China, but there is also a List of longest-reigning monarchs, which includes some Chinese emperors. Therefore, I believe that this article is redundant. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 03:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Soft delete with the possibility of accepting a later more useful version of the article if one is proposed. As it is, what there is of this list is not useful, but it is possible that a useful list may be created. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.