Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long-range planning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-range planning

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this a notable topic? Tagged for no sources since 2009. Natg 19 (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unsourced essay offering a personal perspective on a topic. Mccapra (talk) 22:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the reason stated by Mccapra. This could be a suitable topic for an article; I note that there is an academic journal called "Long Range Planning." However, given the complete absence of sources in the existing article, it seems to me that it would would be better for such an article to be started from scratch. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable topic --Devoke water 17:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.