Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Anti-Human Trafficking Committee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

London Anti-Human Trafficking Committee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local charitable organization that fails notability requirements of WP:ORG. Kelly ^hi! 21:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge – not supported in depth by any reliable sources, except for local news sources and sources related to the subject. All of the reliable sources mention the subject in passing. epic genius (talk) 20:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Maybe this could be merged to Human trafficking in Canada? I'm not entirely sure what would be merged there, though. There isn't a whole lot of meat here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. They're a local organisation who staged one rally, ran two local events, and staged a local amateur version of the author's favourite play. This could have been speedied: every short-lived local activist group ever would pass notability criteria if it were this broad. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now all in all as there's not much for a better article aside from the current somewhat amount of sources. SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I guess there isn't anything to merge, and it doesn't look like there's any coverage outside of community newsletters. I agree that local organizations this marginal don't satisfy WP:ORG. Otherwise, if I became friends with a local reporter, our book club might become notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Human trafficking in Canada. Montanabw ^(talk) 05:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.