Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lombardi Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lombardi Software[edit]

non notable Excariver (talk) 19:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We've already had the deletion tag removed when this page was created. Lombardi is notable because it is one of the last remain "Pure Play" vendors in BPM. It is also the first to create an enterprise 2.0 / web 2.0 product. This is significant in the BPM industry and shapes the future of BPM and what it may become. not sure why another deletion tag was placed when one was already removed. The admin that was ok with the removal was User:Redfarmer Palaks (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The user is referring to when I tagged the page for speedy deletion. The page was subsequently cleaned up to where it met WP:CSD. Whether it is notable or not will be seen from this discussion. P.S. For the record, I'm not an admin but I'm flattered people think I am. Redfarmer (talk) 23:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article does not meet WP:CORP or other guides. Vegaswikian (talk) 09:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- they have a product in the Gartner's Leaders Quadrant for BPMS 2007. I would say any company with a product in the Leader's Quadrant for their market segment is ipso facto notable--SJK (talk) 08:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, most of the sources I could find simply appeared to be republished press releases issued by the company. I'm not sure they meet WP:CORP. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Tech businesses marketing non-consumer products need to have fairly obvious indicia of notability from the beginning. This article has no references or external links other than to the company's own website. The description of the business is vague and buzzword laden too: if you asked someone for their job description, and they told you they "manage processes", would you be satisfied with that description? - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.