Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lombard Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lombard Wikipedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Internet encyclopedia with <10,000 articles. All coverage is from Wikimedia projects. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:WEB. Ironholds (talk) 07:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Our very own version of bandcruft! Delete as failing general notability guideline due to lack of independent reliable sources. Guy (Help!) 12:29, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See my remarks about the Yiddish Wikipedia above. We might redirect this to the List of Wikipedias (and there's a strongly-arguable case for that) but deleting it outright is not appropriate.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 12:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Wikipedias. We shouldn't make it hard for anyone who searches for the Lombard Wikipedia on this one to find it. However, we shouldn't have a full article on a project that doesn't meet our notability standards for websites. — Gavia immer (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wikipedia and perm-prot. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 05:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, are you really kidding? Are you really planning on deleting a Wikipedia article about Wikipedia? Dew Kane (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Wikipedias for the time being until more refs can be found. Airplaneman ^talk 16:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.