Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loizza Aquino
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 02:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Loizza Aquino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 18:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - I think the awards are a sign of notability. There are several reliable sources already cited in the article (the Star, Winnipeg Sun, possibly Flare) and others that aren't cited, such as the CBC [1], [2] and the Philstar [3] Furius (talk) 17:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Sustained coverage in reliable sources over a 6+ years: Global News 2021, Global News 2018, CBC News 2015 among others. Seems to meet WP:GNG. Samsmachado (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.