Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logtrust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logtrust[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A striking unsourced claim and lots of press releases. Aaaand... that's about it. Guy (Help!) 14:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 15:46, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 15:46, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 15:46, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Guy. He is very kind in his description. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article does not meet WP:NCORP. It also fails WP:GNG because it lacks significant reliable sources. It is also promotional in nature and obviously lacks any encyclopedic merit. The nominator was indeed kind in his description. Newshunter12 (talk) 11:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.