Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logisim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Logisim

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Logisim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article relies heavily on primary sources and makes unsubstantiated claims like "used by must students in computer science". There's no further coverage in independent reliable sources that isn't trivial. A google books search does show some coverage as a suggested programme for computer science student but nothing that adds substantially that would help the article grow beyond a stub. The article has been issue tagged for over 10 years. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 21:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 21:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete While this software does seem to be common enough to warrant youtube tutorials, I couldn't find any significant secondary coverage. Fails WP:GNG. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 23:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.