Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan City Jets (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Female Gridiron League of Queensland. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logan City Jets[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This club has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, therefore fails WP:GNG. I have searched Google News, EBSCO Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre, Factiva and Fairfax News Store and the only mention of this club in a reliable source is the Courier-Mail article in the article. Hack (talk) 04:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 09:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 09:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 09:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is an entirely amateur team in a seriously obscure sports league. Nick-D (talk) 10:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but merge to Female Gridiron League of Queensland. In looking at the articles, FGLQ is a short article, so the material here could be rolled in there reasonably. I think the history of this page should be preserved, so for AfD purposes, my !vote is to keep. I do think the merge should go on, either as an outcome of this AfD directly or through a separate merge discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 14:08, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 16:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as above. And as was done in the Kenmore Panthers AfD Non-notable team, and small enough article that the page can take a paragraph for each of the four teams. Neonchameleon (talk) 01:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - Material would be appropriate in the league article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.