Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogSumExp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 01:08, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LogSumExp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep. Known, useful, referenced mathematical function. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 16:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm seeing about 60 hits for this on Google scholar, from many unrelated research groups. That to me indicates that it is in general if not wide use, enough to justify an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.